Methods for determining the coefficients of weight of dynamic integral indicators.
Abstract
The article deals with methods of constructing integral indicators of socio-economic phenomena and processes; and argues for the necessity to record the development of the phenomena over time; it also introduces new approaches to the aggregation. A method of aggregation of individual features that characterize different sides of complex phenomena, in the integral indicator that takes into account the nonequivalence of individual features and their trends in time.
Much attention is paid to calculating integral indicators weight indexes in a dynamic aspect. The calculated indicators can be matched both in statics and in time, providing a comparative description of a complex phenomenon, allowing to judge its dynamics, making final conclusions more visible and unequivocal. The article investigates of weighting coefficients in the economic and statistical analysis of economic and social phenomena.
Much attention is paid to calculating integral indicators weight indexes in a dynamic aspect. The calculated indicators can be matched both in statics and in time, providing a comparative description of a complex phenomenon, allowing to judge its dynamics, making final conclusions more visible and unequivocal. The article investigates of weighting coefficients in the economic and statistical analysis of economic and social phenomena.
About the Authors
V. L. Somov
Rosstat Territorial Statistical Office for Saratov Region
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. N. Tolmachev
Saratov Social-Economic Institute of the P�lekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Rabinovich P.M. Nekotoryye voprosy teorii mnogomernykh gruppirovok [Some questions of theory of multidimensional groups]. Vestnik statistiki, 1976, no. 7, pp. 52-63. (In Russ.).
2. Ryabtsev V.M. O mnogomernykh srednikh i gruppirovkakh [About multidimensional means and groupings]. Vestnik statistiki, 1976, no. 8, pp. 42-46 (In Russ.).
3. Dines V.A., Prokof’yev V.A., Bogdanov R.R. Reiting ob”ektov vysshei shkoly [The rating of the higher school]. Saratov, SGSEU P�ubl., 2001. 92 p. (In Russ.).
4. Yeliseyeva I.I. (ed.) Ekonometrika: ucheb. [Econometrics: textbook]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika �ubl., 2007. 576 p. (In Russ.).
5. Afanas’yev V.N. (ed.) Ekonometrika: ucheb. [Econometrics: textbook]. Orenburg, OGU �ubl., 2012. 402 p. (In Russ.).
6. Nekrestianova U.N. �rintsip naimen’shego deistviya kak instrument vychisleniya optimal’nykh znachenii vesovykh koeffitsientov [The principle of least action as a tool for calculating optimal values of weight]. Mezhdunarodnyi nauchnyi institut «EDUCATIO», 2015, no. 4 (11), part 1, pp. 70-73. (In Russ.).
7. Postnikov V.M., Spiridonov S.B. Metody vybora vesovykh koeffitsientov lokal’nykh kriteriev [Selecting methods of the weighting factors of local criteria]. Science and Education of the Bauman MSTU, 2015, no. 6, pp. 267-287. D�OI: 10.7463/0615.0780334. (In Russ.).
8. Tolmachev M.N. �ostroenie obobshchayushchikh pokazatelei s uchetom dinamicheskogo faktora [Construction of general indicators taking into account the dynamic factor]. Ekonomika, statistika i informatika. Vestnik UMO, 2010, no. 2, pp. 117-121. (In Russ.).
9. Tolmachev M.N. Obobshchayushchaya otsenka kontsentratsii sel’skokhozyaistvennogo proizvodstva [General evaluation of the concentration of agricultural production]. Vestnik NSU. Series: Social and Economics Sciences, 2011, no. 1, pp. 46-53. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Somov V.L., Tolmachev M.N. Methods for determining the coefficients of weight of dynamic integral indicators. Voprosy statistiki. 2017;(6):74-79. (In Russ.)
Views:
636
Email this article 