Indicators of Economic Security in the Scientifi c and Technological Sphere
https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2019-26-10-5-17
Abstract
Improving competitiveness in the scientifi c and technological sphere is one of the strategic directions for development of the national economy of the Russian Federation. In this regard, the scientifi c and technological potential and the degree of alignment of scientifi c, public and production resources come to the fore as the main components of the national power of the Russian Federation. This article addresses questions of selecting the criteria for assessing economic security in scientifi c and technological sphere amidst the formation of national innovative system in the Russian Federation using the triple helix model. The authors reviewed the existing systems of criteria and indicators, proposed matrix indicators to assess economic security in a scientifi c and technological fi eld according to the triple helix principle, calculated values of indicators according to the data from forty-three countries, made comparative analysis of the normalized partial indicators. The authors also formulated conclusion showing the strengths and weaknesses of scientifi c and technological sphere in the Russian Federation.
About the Authors
M. S. Vlasova
Saint Petersburg State University of Economics
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Assistant Professor
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Assistant Professor
O. S. Stepchenkova
International Banking Institute
Russian Federation
Postgraduate Student, Department of Economics and Finance of Enterprises and Industries
Russian Federation
Postgraduate Student, Department of Economics and Finance of Enterprises and Industries
References
1. Semenov E.V. Scientific and Technological Sphere: Ways of Representation of Object. Science. Innovation. Education. 2013;(14):82-98. (In Russ.) Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/nauchno-tehnologicheskaya-sfera-sfera-nioktr-sposoby-predstavleniya-obekta
2. Etzkowitz H. Triple Helix Model. Innovations. 2011;4(150):5-10. (In Russ.) Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/model-troynoy-spirali
3. Smorodinskaya N.V. Triple Helix as a New Matrix of Economic Systems. Innovations. 2011;4(150):66-78. (In Russ.) Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/troynaya-spiral-kak-novaya-matritsa-ekonomicheskih-sistem
4. Dezhina I.G., Kiseleva V.V. «Triple Helix» in Russia’s Innovation System. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2007;(12):123-135. (In Russ.) Available from: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2007-12-123-135.
5. Il’ina I.E., Burlankov S.P., Zharova E.N. Monitoring of the Russian Federation’s Scientific and Technological Development Strategy Realization. University Proceedings. Volga Region. Social Sciences. 2017;4(44):158-170. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21685/2072-3016-2017-4-17.
6. Morozova T.V. Improving the Methodology for Assessing and Monitoring Scientific and Technological Security at the Regional Level. Cand. Econ. Sci. Diss. Moscow: 2006. (In Russ.)
7. Tatarkin A.I. et al.; Tatarkin A.I., Kuklin A.A. (eds.) Scientific and Technological Security of the Regions of Russia. Methodological Approaches and Diagnostic Results. Yekaterinburg: Ural University Publishing House; 2000. 414 p. (In Russ.)
8. Gordienko D.V. A Comparative Assessment of the Technological Security Levels of China, Japan, the USA, the EU Countries and the Russian Federation in Modern Conditions. In: Security Issues in Northeast Asia: Regional Dimensions and Russian-Chinese Cooperation. Moscow: IFES RAS; 2015. P. 8-57. (In Russ.) Available from: http://www.ifes-ras.ru/online-library/book/5-monograph/252-ProblemsSVA-2015.
9. Gelvanovsky M.I. Methodological Approaches to Ensuring Financial and Economic Security at the National and Global Levels. In: The Strategy of Economic Security of Russia: New Development Guidelines: Proceedings of the 1st Scientific and Practical Conference «Senchagov Readings» of Scientists, Specialists, University Professors, Graduate Students. Moscow, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, March 14, 2017. Moscow: Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2017. P. 71-81. (In Russ.) Available from: http://inecon.org/docs/2017/Senchagov_2017.pdf.
10. Mityakov S.N. On the Organization of Monitoring the Economic Security of Russia. In: The Strategy of Economic Security of Russia: New Development Guidelines: Proceedings of the 1st Scientific and Practical Conference «Senchagov Readings» of Scientists, Specialists, University Professors, Graduate Students. Moscow, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, March 14, 2017. Moscow: Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2017. P. 57-65. (In Russ.) Available from: http://inecon. org/docs/2017/Senchagov_2017.pdf.
11. Vlasova M.S., Stepchenkova O.S. On the Development of the Technological Security Monitoring System During the Transition to a High-Tech Economy. National Interests: Priorities and Security. 2018;14(9):1680-1692. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.14.9.1680.
12. Lovtsov D.A., Bogdanova M.V., Mikhailov M.A. Statistics: Textbook. Moscow: RPMU Publ.; 2010. 120 p. (In Russ.)
13.
14.
Review
For citations:
Vlasova M.S., Stepchenkova O.S. Indicators of Economic Security in the Scientifi c and Technological Sphere. Voprosy statistiki. 2019;26(10):5-17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2019-26-10-5-17
Views:
1921
Email this article 