Preview

Voprosy statistiki

Advanced search

Family transformation in Russia and China: comparative analysis

https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2016-0-8-53-65

Abstract

Family is the principle institution in Russian as well as in Chinese society - on these premises the authors of the article conducted comparative socio-demographic analysis of the transformation that is happening to families in both Russia and China. The objective of this paper is to describe main directions of such changes in Russia and China and their place in the general context of the family transformation. Official Russian and Chinese statistics was used as a data source. For China, skewed sex ratio at birth is one of the most acute problems which in the paper is viewed from the standpoint of demographic policy of the 1980s. The authors draw a conclusion that in China there is a preponderance of men aged under 30 years, while in Russia women are overrepresented in the age group of 35 and older. Increasing prevalence of extra-marital unions and births in both countries is noted. In Russia, these phenomena are more clearly seen in the Far East and Siberia and are associated with a more active domestic migration in these regions. In China, premarital cohabitation is recorded in large cities, although to a much lesser extent than in Russia and in the Western countries; nevertheless, the spread of cohabitation is one of the main characteristic signs of the present time. Migration within China (first and foremost, from rural to urban areas) does not cause rupture in intergenerational and marital relations, while in Russia migration processes correlate with divorce trends and the prevalence of single-parent and other types of families. The authors outline common features and specific manifestations of ongoing family transformation in Russia and China (which generally speaking aligns with the Second Demographic Transition theory) and the role of continental peculiarities in demographic processes. Transformation patterns observed among the Chinese families make it possible to conclude that China belongs to the South-Asian family transformation model, while Russia - to the West-European model.

About the Authors

Irina I. Eliseeva
Saint Petersburg State University of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation


Michael A. Klupt
Saint Petersburg State University of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation


References

1. Всероссийская перепись населения 2010. URL: http:/ /www.gks.ru/free_dDc/new_site/perepis2010/crDc/ perepis_itogi1612.htm.

2. Демографический ежегодник России 2007: Стат. сб./ Росстат. М., 2007. URL: http://www.gks.ru/bgd/regl/ B07_16/Main.htm.

3. Демографический ежегодник России 2015: Стат. сб. / Росстат. М., 2015.

4. Захаров С. Браки и разводы в современной России / /Демоскоп. № 625-826,1-25 января 2015.

5. Миронова А.А Родственная межпоколенная солидарность в России//Социологические исследования. 2014. №10. С.136-142.

6. Прокофьева Л.М. Отцы и их дети после развода // Социологические исследования. 2002. № 6. С.11-115.

7. Прокофьева Л., Фести П. Алименты, пособия и доходы семьи после развода // Мир России. 1997. Т. 6. С. 19-25.

8. Семья в России и Китае. Процесс модернизации/под ред. И.И. Елисеевой, Сюй Ан-ци.- СПб, Нестор-история, 2015.

9. Attane I. The Demographic impact ofa female deficit in China, 2000-2050// Population and development review. Vol. 32, No. 4 (Dec., 2006). P 755-770.

10. Calhoun C. Explanation in historical sociology: narrative, general theory and historically specific theory // American journal of sociology. 1998. 104 (3). P. 846-871.

11. Chen L.J., Yang D.L. & Ren Q. Report on the state of children in China. Chicago: chapin hall at the university of Chicago, 2015.

12. Chengchao Zhou et al. China's left-behind children: impact of parental migration on health, nutrition, and educational outcomes // Health affairs. 2015. 34 (11). P. 1-8.

13. China families panel study. URL: https:// www.src.isr.umich.edu/international/china-family-panel-studies/

14. China statistical yearbook 2015. URL: http:// www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2015/indexeh.htm

15. Eastasian social survey (EASS), cross-national survey data sets: families in east Asia, 2006 URL: http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/ icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/34606

16. Griffin L. Temporality, events, and explanation in historical sociology // Sociological methods and research. 1992. 20 (4). P. 403-427.

17. Hongwei Xu, Yu Xie. The causal effects of rural-to-urban migration on children's well-being in China.China family panel studies. WP 13-002, 2013.

18. Jia Yu, Yu Xie. Cohabitation in China: trends and determinants // Population and development review. 2015. 41 (4). P. 607-628.

19. Kobayashi K., Kampen R. Cohabitation in Asia//Quah S. (ed.). Routledge handbook offamilies inAsia. Abingdon, Oxon, N.-Y.: Routledge, 2015. P. 377-397.

20. Lee J., Paik M. Sex preferences and fertility in South Korea during the year ofthe horse//Demography. 2006. 43 (2). P 269-292.

21. Lesthaeghe R. The Unfolding story of the second demographic transition // Population and development review. 2010. P. 211-251.

22. Lianling Su. Cross-Border Marriage Migration of Vietnamese Women to China. A Thesis. Kansas State University. Manhattan, Kansas, 2013. URL: https://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/ bitstream/handle/2097/15663/LianlingSu2013. pdf?sequence=1.

23. Loh Ch., Remick E. China's skewed sex ratio and the one the one-child policy. The China Quarterly / Vol. 222 / June 2015. P. 295-319.

24. Ochiai E., Hosoya L. Transformation ofthe intimate and the public in asian modernity. BRILL, 2014.

25. Parish W., Laumann E., Mojola S. Sexual behavior in China: trends and comparisons, source: population and development review. 2007. Vol. 33. No. 4. P. 729-756.

26. Report: Chinese families become smaller. URL: http:// www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2015-05/13/content_ 20708152.htm.

27. Sewell W. Three temporalities: toward a sociology of the event.

28. Vietnamese girls smuggled into China and sold as child brides. The Manila Times April 18, 2016. URL: http:// www.manilatimes.net/vietnamese-girls-smuggled-into-china-and-sold-as-child-brides/256988/.

29. Woojin Chung, Das Gupta M. The decline of son preference in South Korea: The roles of development and public policy // Population and development review. 2007. 33 (4). P. 757-783.

30. Yu Xie. Gender and family in contemprary China. Population studies center research report 13-808. October 2013.

31. Yue Qian, Zhenchao Qian. The gender divide in urban China: Singlehood and assortative mating by age and education //Demographic Research. Vol. 31. Article 45. P. 1337-1364. URL: http://www.demographic-research.org/ Volumes/Vol31/45/

32. Zhan Hu, Xizhe Peng. Household changes in contemporary China: an analysis based on the four recent censuses/ /The Journal ofChinese Sociology. 2015: 2-9.

33. Zheng Mu, Yu Xie. Marital age homogamy in China: A reversal oftrend in the reform era? // Social Science Research. 2014. 44. P. 141-157.


Review

For citations:


Eliseeva I.I., Klupt M.A. Family transformation in Russia and China: comparative analysis. Voprosy statistiki. 2016;(8):53-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2016-0-8-53-65

Views: 760


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2313-6383 (Print)
ISSN 2658-5499 (Online)