Professional and Social Statuses as Predictors of Alcohol Consumption by Working Russians

The paper analyses alcohol consumption patterns among working residents of Russia, depending on their professional and social statuses, using statistical methods. The study is based on data from the Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey of the National Research University Higher School of Economics for the period of 2013–2019. Sampling included working women aged 16 to 55 and men aged 16 to 60.

The introductory part of the article covers the main trends in alcohol consumption among working Russians with different professional and social statuses. The main part of the article presents the results of an empirical study of the statistical relationship between the characteristics of an employee's professional and social statuses and indicators characterizing the probability and volume of consumption of specific alcoholic beverages (beer, wine, vodka, etc.) and alcohol in general. An econometric analysis of the relationships was carried out based on a random effect panel logistic model and an individual random effect Tobin model. Statistical estimates were made separately for men and women. The regression analysis helped the authors find an increase in the probability of consuming alcohol in general, as well as wine and spirits (cognac, whiskey, liqueurs) for workers with the highest professional status (legislators; high-ranking officials; senior and mid-level executives), as well as women with mid-level qualifications compared to unskilled workers. At the same time, the authors recognized a downward trend in the probability of vodka consumption for the respondents of both gender groups with the growth of their professional status (most pronounced for women). In addition, with an increase in the professional status of an individual, there was a trend towards a decrease in the volume of alcohol consumption in general and by specific beverages except for wine. The volume of wine consumption by men from the categories of "clerks and workers in trade and services" and "mid-level professionals; officials" exceeded the value of the corresponding indicator for unskilled workers. An analysis of the statistical relationship between the social status of working Russians and their predisposition to consume alcoholic beverages revealed an increase in the probability of consumption of selected alcoholic beverages among representatives of both gender groups and the probability of alcohol consumption in general (among men) with an increase in the social status of an individual with more moderate consumption compared to workers with lower social status (for men).

According to the authors, the results of this study can be relevant to the elaboration of specific alcohol policy measures aimed at reducing alcohol consumption among the employed population of our country.

1. Griswold M.G. et al. Alcohol Use and Burden for 195 Countries and Territories, 1990–2016: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet. 2018;392(10152):1015–1035. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31310-2.

2. Probst C. et al. The Role of Alcohol Use and Drinking Patterns in Socioeconomic Inequalities in Mortality: A Systematic Review. The Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(6):e324– e332. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30052-9.

3. Kim Y. Perceived Social Status and Unhealthy Habits in Korea. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2019;194:1–5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.09.014.

4. Shaikh R.A. et al. Occupational Variations in Obesity, Smoking, Heavy Drinking, and Non-Adherence to Physical Activity Recommendations: Findings from the 2010 Natio nal Health Interview Survey. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 2015;58(1):77–87. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22405.

5. Martynenko P.A., Roshchina Y.M. Patterns of Alcohol Consumption as a Social Group Indicator in Modern Russian Cities. Economic Sociology. 2014;15(1):20–42. (In Russ.) Available from: https://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2014-1-134-152.

6. Liberatos P., Link B., Kelsey J. The Measurement of Social Class in Epidemiology. Epidemiologic Reviews. 1988;10(1):87–121. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036030.

7. Khan S., Murray R., Barnes G. A Structural Equation Model of the Effect of Poverty and Unemployment on Alcohol Abuse. Addictive Behaviors. 2002;27(3):405–423. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-4603(01)00181-2.

8. Temple M.T. et al. A Meta-Analysis of Change in Marital and Employment Status as Predictors of Alcohol Consumption on a Typical Occasion. British Journal of Addiction. 1991;86(10):1269–1281. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01703.x.

9. Jackman M.R., Jackman R.W. An Interpretation of the Relation Between Objective and Subjective Social Status. American Sociological Review. 1973;38(5):569–852.

10. Diemer M.A. et al. Best Practices in Conceptualizing and Measuring Social Class in Psychological Research. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. 2013;13(1):77– 113. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12001.

11. D’Hooge L., Achterberg P., Reeskens T. Mind over Matter. The Impact of Subjective Social Status on Health Outcomes and Health Behaviors. PLoS One. 2018;13(9):e0202489. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202489.

12. Pinxten W., Lievens J. The Importance of Economic, Social and Cultural Capital in Understanding Health Inequalities: Using a Bourdieu-based Approach in Research on Physical and Mental Health Perceptions. Sociology ofHealth and Illness. 2014;36(7):1095–1110. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12154.

13. Frone M.R. Work Stress and Alcohol Use. Alcohol Research and Health. 1999;23(4):284–291.

14. Norström T., Romelsjö A. Social Class, Drinking and Alcohol-related Mortality. Journal of Substance Abuse. 1998;10(4):385–395. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-3289(99)00013-9.

15. Hillman A., Chapparo C. An Investigation of Occupational Role Performance in Men over Sixty Years of Age, Following a Stroke. Journal of Occupational Science. 1995;2(3):88–99.

16. Huerta M., Borgonovi F. Education, Alcohol Use and Abuse Among Young Adults in Britain. Social Science and Medicine. 2010;71(1):143–151. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.03.022.

17. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Deve lopment. The Effect of COVID-19 on Alcohol Consumption, and Policy Responses to Prevent Harmful Alcohol Consumption, OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19). Paris: OECD Publishing; 2021. 11 p. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1787/53890024-en.

18. Andrienko Y., Nemtsov A. Estimation of Individual Demand for Alcohol. EERC Working Paper Series 05-10e. Moscow: EERC Research Network, Russia and CIS; 2015. 47 p. (In Russ.)

19. Kolosnitsyna M., Khorkina N., Dorzhiev Kh. Alcohol Pricing Policy in Russia: Influence on Alcohol Consumption. Economic Policy. 2015;10(5):171–190. (In Russ.)

20. Ponomareva M.S. Microeconomic Determinants of Youth Alcohol Consumption. Cand. Econ. Sci. Diss. Mos-cow: 2013. 28 p. (In Russ.)

21. Neumark Y.D., Rahav G., Jaffe D.H. Socio-Economic Status and Binge Drinking in Israel. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2003;69(1):15–21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-8716(02)00248-x.