Measuring the ICT Sector in the Digital Economy
https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2021-28-6-5-17
Abstract
The article addresses the problem of measuring the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) sector and its relationship to the digital economy as defined in the OECD «Guidelines for Supply-Use Tables for the Digital Economy». Analysis of various concepts of the digital economy shows that the ICT sector is its key element. It is stressed that, in line with the OECD recommendations, the measurement of the digital economy should be based on the SNA satellite account, the core element of which are the Digital Supply-Use Tables (Digital SUTs). This approach enables to reflect most fully within a single statistical model integration of all phases of digital products (goods and services) circulation in the national economy.
It is noted that the construction of ICT Supply-Use Tables (SUTs) is a critical self-contained task, as it provides a measurement framework for both digital (regardless of the model to be adopted) and (more broadly) information economy.
It is stressed that the ability to capture the use of ICT products as well as the cost of their production depends significantly on the identification and valuation of digital products and industries in the Digital SUTs. The identification of such industries is now a major challenge because of the lack of separate activities in the existing industrial classifications that are characteristic for their constituent units.
The article concludes with a presentation of the pilot estimates of ICT Sector SUTs core indicators obtained by the authors at the Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence, HSE University. The contribution of the sector to the GDP of the Russian Federation is analysed and its inter-sectoral linkages, both on the demand and supply side, are assessed. It is concluded that the full implementation of the Digital SUTs depends on the inclusion in the new International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC) the additions necessary to identify and evaluate digital products and industries.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. A. TatarinovRussian Federation
Andrey A. Tatarinov – Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Leading Expert; Chief Expert
39, Myasnitskaya Str., Build. 1, Moscow, 107450
11, Pokrovsky Boulevard, Room T404, Moscow, 109028
N. E. Ustinova
Russian Federation
Nataliya E. Ustinova – Expert, Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence
11, Pokrovsky Boulevard, Room T404, Moscow, 109028
References
1. OECD. Measuring the Information Economy. Paris: OECD Publ.; 2002. 93 p. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/sti/ieconomy/1835738.pdf.
2. OECD. Information Economy Product Definitions Based on the Central Product Classification (Version 2). Paris: OECD Publ.; 2009. 20 p. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/science/inno/42978297.pdf.
3. OECD Guide to Measuring the Information Society 2011. Paris: OECD Publ.; 2011. 209 p. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264113541-en.
4. Core ICT Indicators. Partnership on Measuring ICT for Development. Beirut: UN ESCWA; 2005. 53 p. Available from: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/coreindicators/Core_ICT_Indicators_E.pdf.
5. Measuring ICT: The Global Status of ICT Indicators. New York: UN ICT Task Force; 2005. 184 p. Available from: https://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/partnership/material/05-42742%20GLOBAL%20ICT.pdf.
6. Measuring the Information Society Report 2018. Vol. 1. Geneva: ITU; 2018. 204 p. Available from: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/publications/misr2018/MISR-2018-Vol-1-E.pdf.
7. UNCTAD. Information Economy Report 2017: Digitalization, Trade and Development. Geneva: UNCTAD; 2017. 130 p. Available from: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ier2017_en.pdf.
8. UNCTAD. Digital Economy Report 2019: Value Creation and Capture: Implications for Developing Countries. Geneva: UNCTAD; 2019. 194 p. Available from: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/der2019_en.pdf.
9. OECD. A Roadmap Toward a Common Framework for Measuring the Digital Economy: Report for the G20 Digital Economy Task Force. OECD; 2020. 123 p. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/sti/roadmap-toward-a-common-framework-for-measuring-the-digital-economy.pdf.
10. IMF. Measuring the Digital Economy. Washington DC: IMF; 2018. 48 p. Available from: https://www.imf.org/en/%20Publications/Policy-Papers/Issues/2018/04/03/022818-measuring-the-digital-economy.
11. World Bank. World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends. Washington DC: World Bank Group, 2016. 359 p. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0671-1.
12. Bukht R., Heeks R. Defining, Conceptualising and Measuring the Digital Economy. The Development Informatics Working Paper No. 68. Manchester: University of Manchester; 2017. 26 p. Available from: http://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/institutes/gdi/publications/workingpapers/di/di_wp68.pdf.
13. Goldfarb A., Tucker C. Digital Economics. Journal of Economic Literature. 2019;57(1):3–43. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20171452.
14. Negroponte N. Being Digital. New York: Alfred A. Knopf; 1995. 243 p.
15. Schmitt B. From Atoms to Bits and Back: A Research Curation on Digital Technology and Agenda for Future Research. Journal of Consumer Research. 2019;46(4):825–832. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucz038.
16. OECD. Guidelines for Supply-Use Tables for the Digital Economy. Prepared for the meeting of the Informal Advisory Group on Measuring GDP in a Digitalised Economy. OECD; 2019. 27 p. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=SDD/CSSP/WPNA(2019)1/REV1&docLanguage=En.
17. OECD. High Priority Indicators in the Digital Supply-Use Tables. Working Party on National Accounts. OECD; 2019. 17 p. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=SDD/CSSP/WPNA(2019)2&docLanguage=En.
Review
For citations:
Tatarinov A.A., Ustinova N.E. Measuring the ICT Sector in the Digital Economy. Voprosy statistiki. 2021;28(6):5-17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2021-28-6-5-17