Economic and Statistical Analysis of Sustainability Indicators of Banking Sectors of the Leading Countries
https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2020-27-4-97-113
Abstract
The last decade was characterized by the improvement of the financial systems’ monitoring mechanism at the national and international levels aimed at making effective decisions on financial stabilisation. The purpose of this study is to assess the sustainability of banking sectors of the leading economically developed and developing countries for the period 2009-2018, taking into account the processes occurring in the global economy and international financial markets.
The research applied the International Monetary Fund methodology for assessing the stability of depository institutions and used the IMF database containing financial soundness indicators of the banking sectors in the studied countries. The economic and statistical analysis of financial soundness indicators of the banking sectors made it possible to explain the influence of economic conditions on the level and dynamics of the banks’ performance indicators as well as to identify the strengths and problems of the banking systems.
The results of the study indicate an increase in the sustainability of the developed countries’ banking sectors, which is confirmed by the growing trends of capital adequacy and the quality of bank loan portfolios. The main problem of the developed countries is stably low profitability which, in the long term, could lead to a decrease in the banks’ capitalisation and their inability to maintain economic growth.
A positive trend in the banking sectors of the developing countries is the recovery of capital adequacy, whereas the negative trend is a decrease in the quality of loan portfolios and profitability indicators. High credit risks and insufficient capitalisation represent the vulnerabilities of the developing countries’ banking sectors, while the increased volatility of financial soundness indicators, especially liquidity, is caused by the impact of the external trade and financial conditions.
The results of this research could be used by analysts and regulators in macroeconomic calculations and when developing supervisory stress testing models, as well as by bank managers for performing internal stress tests and strategic business planning.
About the Author
S. Yu. KhasyanovaRussian Federation
Svetlana Yu. Khasyanova – Cand. Sci. (Econ.), PhD of Universitа Degli Studi Guglielmo Marconi (Italy, Rome), Associate Professor, Head of Banking Department, Faculty of Economics, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
25/12, Bolshaya Pecherskaya Str., Nizhny Novgorod, 603155
References
1. Jokivuolle E., Pesola J., Viren M. Why is Creditto-GDP a Good Measure for Setting Countercyclical Capital Buffers? Journal of Financial Stability. 2015;18(C):117-126. Available from: doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2015.03.005.
2. Bezemer D., Grydaki M., Zhang L. More Mortgages, Lower Growth? Economic Inquiry. 2016;54(1):652-674. Available from: doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12254.
3. Frécaut O. A National Wealth Approach to Banking Crises and Financial Stability. Voprosy Statistiki. 2017;(2):68-82.
4. Kurnysheva I.R., Bass A.B. Regulation of Imperfect Credit Markets: Challenges of Modern Age. Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossijskoj Akademii Nauk. 2016;(4):105-121. (In Russ.)
5. Saeed M., Izzeldin M. Examining the Relationship Between Default Risk and Efficiency in Islamic and Conventional Banks: Special Issue on Islamic Finance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 2016;132:127-154. Available from: doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.02.014.
6. Wang Y.-S., Jiang X., Liu Z.-J. Bank Failure Prediction Models for the Developing and Developed Countries: Identifying the Economic Value Added for Predicting Failure. Asian Economic and Financial Review. 2016;6(9):522533.
7. Urnov M.Yu. The Economic Crisis in Russia: Causes, Deployment Mechanisms and the Possible Consequences. Journal of the New Economic Association. 2015;26(2):186-189.(In Russ.)
8. Andreev M. et al. Macroprudential Policy and Financial (In)Stability Analysis in the Russian Federation. Journal of Money and Finance. 2019;78(3):3-37. (In Russ.) Available from: https://doi.org/10.31477/rjmf.201903.03.
9. Golovnin M.Yu., Kochetovskaya O.S. Impact of External Shocks on a Banking System of Russia (Comparison of Crises 2008-2009 and 2014-2016). Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossijskoj Akademii Nauk. 2017;(6):13-30. (In Russ.)
10. Kolomiets A.G. The Significance of Threats to the Security of the Financial and Banking System. Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossijskoj Akademii Nauk. 2018;(1):103-117. (In Russ.)
11. Stolbov M. et al. Comparison of the Model of the Russian Financial Sector with Models of Financial Sectors of Other Countries. Bank of Russia Working Paper Series. 2017;(23):1-69. (In Russ.)
12. Belousova V.Yu., Kozyr I.O. How Do Macroeconomic Indicators Influence Banking Profitability in Russia? Journal of the New Economic Association. 2016;2(30):77-103. (In Russ.)
13. Polyakov K.L., Polyakova M.V. Modeling Sustainability of the Russian Banks and Banking System Reform. Voprosy Statistiki. 2017;(12):25-39. (In Russ.).
14. Makinen M., Solanko L. Determinants of Bank Closures: Do Levels or Changes of CAMEL Variables Matter? Journal of Money and Finance. 2018;77(2):3-21. (In Russ.) Available from: doi: https://doi.org/10.31477/rjmf.201802.03.
Review
For citations:
Khasyanova S.Yu. Economic and Statistical Analysis of Sustainability Indicators of Banking Sectors of the Leading Countries. Voprosy statistiki. 2020;27(4):97-113. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2020-27-4-97-113