Preview

Voprosy statistiki

Advanced search

Peculiarities of Physical Activity of Russian Workers: Empirical Analyses

https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2019-26-11-45-56

Abstract

Low level of physical activity among working people is a common problem in many countries including Russia. Despite the increase in recent years in the share of people who are physically active, the level of physical inactivity of Russian workers is still significant, which reduces the effectiveness of resources aimed at improving the health of the Russian population.

Studying the changes in the level of physical activity of the working Russian citizens and reviewing its most common types, the authors determine the factors encouraging physical activities and sports. The article identifies the distinguishing features of physical activity among Russian workers, the analysis of the determinants of physical activity, and factors putting obstacles in the way of sport participation.

A comprehensive analysis of correlates of physical activity was conducted based on public opinion surveys commissioned by the HSE and carried out by Levada Analytical Center in 2011 and 2017 years. The sample includes employed respondents, both males and females (females aged 25 to 55years and males aged 25 to 60years).

The analysis revealed the relation between working women and men’s physical activity and their individual and household characteristics, such as: gender, age, body mass index, health self-perception, nutrition, unhealthy lifestyle habits (smoking and alcohol), level of education, per capita income, as well as external attributes (presence of sporting facilities in the immediate vicinity of their home or workplace). At the same time, the analysis did not reveal one-to-one dependence between the probability of being physically active and a number of working hours per week, family status, number of children, place of residence and the availability of sport infrastructure.

In conclusion, the study of factors that can have both a stimulating and a restraining effect on the physical activity of the working population will help optimize the financing of national health and sports systems.

About the Authors

N. A. Khorkina
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

Natalia A. Khorkina - Cand. Sci. (Pedag.), Associate Professor, Department of Applied Economics, Faculty of Economic Sciences.

11, Pokrovsky Bulvar, Moscow, 109028



M. V. Lopatina
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

Marina V Lopatina - Junior Research Fellow NRU HSE; Junior Research Fellow, Russian Presidential Academy ofNational Economy and Public Administration.

11, Pokrovsky Bulvar, Moscow, 109028; 82, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119571



References

1. Special Eurobarometer 472. Sport and Physical Activity. Executive Summary. March 2018. Available from: https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/703e1ae0-fcf7-11e8-a96d-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-search (accessed 1.02.2019) .

2. WHO. Physical Activity Factsheets for the 28 European Union Member States of the WHO European Region, 2018. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/data/assets/pdf_file/0005/382334/28fs-physical-activity-euro-rep-eng.pdf?ua=1 (accessed 15.01.2019).

3. WHO. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. Switzerland, 2010. Available from: http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_recommendations/en/ (accessed 01.02.2019).

4. WHO. Physical Activity Strategy for the WHO European Region 2016-2025. WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2016. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/data/assets/pdf_file/0014/311360/Physical-activity-strategy-2016-2025.pdf?ua=1 (accessed 07.02.2019).

5. McDaid D., Oliver F., Merkur Sh. What do We Know About the Strengths and Weakness of Different Policy Mechanisms to Influence Health Behaviour in the Population? Policy Summary 15. World Health Organization, 2014. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/as-sets/pdf_file/0003/270138/PS15-web.pdf?ua=1 (accessed 12.01.2019) .

6. Gremchenko E.P., Roshchina Ya.M. Factors of Healthy Lifestyle Inclination. Kozyreva P.M. (ed.) Bulletin of Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey (RLMS-HSE). Iss. 6. Мoscow: HSE; 2016. P. 118-163. (In Russ.)

7. Zasimova L.S., Kolosnitsyna M.G., Krasil’nikova M.D. Behavioral Change of the Russian Towards Healthy Lifestyle (Based on the Data from Population Survey of 2011 and 2017). WP8/2017/02 [Preprint]. Institute for Public Administration and Governance HSE, 2017. (In Russ.)

8. Kozyreva P.M., Smirnov A.I., Sokolova S.B. The Spread of Healthy Lifestyle Practices. Kozyreva P.M. (ed.) Bulletin of Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey (RLMS-HSE). Iss. 6. Мoscow: HSE; 2016. P. 96-117. (In Russ.)

9. Downward P., Lera-Lypez F., Rasciute S. The Correlates of Sports Participation in Europe. European Journal of Sport Science. 2014;14(6):592-602.

10. Popham F., Mitchell R. Leisure Time Exercise and Personal Circumstances in the Working Age Population: Longitudinal Analysis of the British Household Panel Survey. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2006;60(3):270-274.

11. Sabiston C.M. et al. Body Image, Physical Activity, and Sport: A Scoping Review. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2019;42:48-57.

12. Anand P., Ben-Shalom Y. How do Working-Age People with Disabilities Spend Their Time? New Evidence from the American Time Use Survey. Demography. 2014;51(6):1977-1998.

13. Mensink G., Loose N., Oomen C.M. Physical Activity and its Association with Other Lifestyle Factors. European Journal of Epidemiology. 1997;13(7):771-778.

14. Cerin E., Leslie E. How Socio-Economic Status Contributes to Participation in Leisure-Time Physical Activity. Social Science and Medicine. 2008;66(12):2596-2609.

15. Kakinami L. et al. The Association Between Income and Leisure-Time Physical Activity is Moderated by Utilitarian Lifestyles: A Nationally Representative US Population (NHANES 1999-2014). Preventive Medicine. 2018;113:147-152.

16. Makinen T.E. et al. Explaining Educational Differences in Leisure-Time Physical Activity in Europe: The Contribution ofWork-Related Factors. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports. 2012;22(3):439-447.

17. Oliveira-Brochado A., Quelhas Brito P., Oliveira-Brochado F. Correlates of Adults’ Participation in Sport and Frequency ofSport. Science and Sports. 2017;32(6):355-363.

18. Pulakka A. et al. Association Between Employment Status and Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior - the Maastricht Study. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2018;60(4):309-315.

19. Van Domelen D.R. et al. Employment and Physical Activity in the U.S. American Journal ofPreventive Medicine. 2011;41(2):136-145.

20. Sternfeld B., Ainsworth B.E., Quesenberry Jr. Physical Activity Patterns in a Diverse Population of Women. Preventive Medicine. 1999;28(3):313-323.

21. Spence J., Lee R. Toward a Comprehensive Model of Physical Activity. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2003;4(1):7-24.

22. Wouter P. Perceptions of the Environment, Physical Activity, and Obesity. Social Science & Medicine. 2006;63(11):2835-2846.

23. Wicker P., Hallmann K., Breuer C. Analyzing the Impact of Sport Infrastructure on Sport Participation Using Geo-Coded Data: Evidence from Multi-Level Models. Sport Management Review. 2013;16(1):54-67.


Review

For citations:


Khorkina N.A., Lopatina M.V. Peculiarities of Physical Activity of Russian Workers: Empirical Analyses. Voprosy statistiki. 2019;26(11):45-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2019-26-11-45-56

Views: 1886


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2313-6383 (Print)
ISSN 2658-5499 (Online)