Preview

Voprosy statistiki

Advanced search

MEASURING THE POTENTIAL LEVEL AND SHORT-TERM GAPS IN RUSSIAN GDP

Abstract

To analyze the economic growth, the ratio of aggregate supply and demand, expansions and contractions in economic activity, there is a need for information on how much the current total output differs from its potential level. The appropriate measures of monetary policies, namely: consolidation or stimulation to smooth out the fluctuations of macroeconomic development, depend on whether the economic aggregate is growing above or below its potential level. Under the neo-Keynesian economic theory, it is assumed that such an unobserved component in the dynamics of the gross domestic product as a long-term potential level corresponds to an equilibrium of the price level while its short-term gaps with real dynamics reflect the processes of price and income adaptation to shocks. The article explores the concept of potential level and short-term gaps in economic growth as well as an algorithm to calculate them using the production function (the Cobb-Douglas specification). The results of an empirical assessment of the potential level and shortterm gaps in the dynamics of Russian gross domestic product for 2006-2016 are presented. Based on the results obtained, the authors determined the amplitude and vector of the actual aggregate output deviations from the potential capabilities of the economy, formulated the factors that contributed to reducing the output potential level and measures that can strengthen the national economic growth. Since mid-2014, the negative output gap corresponded to crisis phenomena when labour and capital were not fully used. The negative nature of the speed regime of the Russian economy can be changed only through those structural reforms that will be conducted thoughtfully, consistently and in accordance with additional support the development of new knowledge, products and technologies.

About the Authors

L. A. Kitrar
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
(Moscow)


T. M. Lipkind
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
(Moscow)


G. V. Ostapkovich
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
(Moscow)


References

1. Kitrar L.A. Analiticheskii otchet «Promyshlennoe razvitie v SNG: est’ li usloviya dlya narashchivaniya potentsiala reindustrializatsii?» [Industrial development in the CIS: Re-industrialization trends and potential]. Moscow, UNIDO, 2017. (In Russ.).

2. Otchet o nauchno-issledovatel’skoi rabote «Kon”yunkturnyi monitoring ekonomicheskikh nastroenii i delovykh tendentsii v Rossii» [Research report «Conjuncture monitoring of economic sentiments and business trends in Russia»]. Moscow, HSE Publ., 2016. Pp. 128-134. (In Russ.).

3. International Monetary Fund. Country report No. 14/176: Russian Federation, selected issues. July 2014. Washington, D.C., IMF, 2014.

4. Abel A., Bernanke B.S., Croushore D. Macroeconomics. 6th ed. Boston, Addison Wesley, 2008.

5. Blanchard O. Macroeconomics. 2nd ed. New Jersey, Prentice Hall, 2000.

6. Dornbush R., Fisher S. Macroeconomics. 6th ed. New York, Mc-Graw-Hill Book Company, 1994.

7. Mankiw N.G. Macroeconomics. 7th ed. New York, Worth Publisher, 2010.

8. Mankiw G., Romer D. (eds.). New Keynesian economics. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. 1991.

9. Sacks J.D., Larrain F.B. Macroeconomics in the global economy. Hemel Hempsted, Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991.

10. International Monetary Fund. World economic outlook: A survey by the staff of the International Monetary Fund. Washington, D.C., IMF, 2015 (April) (Russ. ed.: Mezhdunarodnyi valyutnyi fond. Perspektivy razvitiya mirovoi ekonomiki: neravnomernyi rost - kratkosrochnye i dolgosrochnye faktory. Washington, D.C., IMF, 2015 (Aprel’).

11. Kitrar L.A., Lipkind T.M., Ostapkovich G.V., Chusovlyanov D.S. Praktika identifikatsii nenablyudaemykh komponent traektorii VVP: potentsial’nyi uroven’ i kratkosrochnye razryvy [Identification of the unobservable components in the output trajectory: Potential level and gaps]. Voprosy statistiki, 2015, no. 10, pp. 14-20. (In Russ.).

12. De Masi P.R. IMF estimates of potential output: Theory and practice. IMF WP/97/177. IMF, 1997.

13. Giorno C. et al. Estimating potential output, output gaps and structural budget balances. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 152. Paris, OECD Publishing, 1995.

14. Hodrick R.J., Prescott E.C. Postwar U.S. business cycles: An empirical investigation. Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 1997, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1-16.


Review

For citations:


Kitrar L.A., Lipkind T.M., Ostapkovich G.V. MEASURING THE POTENTIAL LEVEL AND SHORT-TERM GAPS IN RUSSIAN GDP. Voprosy statistiki. 2017;1(11):74-80. (In Russ.)

Views: 521


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2313-6383 (Print)
ISSN 2658-5499 (Online)