The Use of Multipliers in Assessing the Economic Effects of Digital Transformation of Territories (Case Study: Novosibirsk Region)
https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2024-31-2-52-60
Abstract
Development of the digital transformation of the state, the economy in general, business and society creates the need to quantify its results and assess the level of impact on the economy. The paper explains a methodological approach to calculating digital economy multipliers for territories based on the calculation of total income (direct and indirect) from digital activity. The multiplier measures the impact of the digital economy on macroeconomic and regional indicators, helps assess the extent of this impact and study its dynamics. The authors calculated digital economy multipliers for the Russian Federation and at the regional level (using the example of the Novosibirsk region) and estimated total digital sector income with a multiplier effect. The paper concludes with the contribution of digital transformation to the economic growth of the Russian Federation and the development of the Novosibirsk region about the multiplier dynamics and the ratio of direct and indirect effects in the total income of the digital sector. Rosstat data for 2017–2021 served as the information base for empirical calculations.
About the Authors
V. V. Glinskiy
Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management (NSUEM); Siberian Institute of Management – Branch of RANEPA
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir V. Glinskiy – Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor; Professor, Department of Statistics, Head, Research Laboratory «Sustainable Development of Social and Economic Systems»
56, Kamenskaya Str., Novosibirsk, 630099
6, Nizhegorodskaya Str., Novosibirsk, 630102
L. K. Serga
Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management (NSUEM); Siberian Institute of Management – Branch of RANEPA
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Lyudmila K. Serga – Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor; Associate Professor, Department of Statistics, Head, Department of Business Analytics, Accounting and Statistics
56, Kamenskaya Str., Novosibirsk, 630099
6, Nizhegorodskaya Str., Novosibirsk, 630102
K. S. Yushina
Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management (NSUEM); Aperbot LLC
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kristina S. Yushina – Postgraduate Student, Project Manager
56, Kamenskaya Str., Novosibirsk, 630099
10, Veteranov Pass., Bldg.1, Zvenigorod, 143180
References
1. Tapscott D. The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence. McGraw-Hill; 1994. 368 p.
2. Negroponte N. Being Digital. New York: Alfred A. Knopf; 1995.
3. Barefoot K. et al. Defining and Measuring the Digital Economy. Working Paper. Maryland, MD: Bureau of Economic Analysis Suitland; 2018. P. 25.
4. International Monetary Fund. Measuring the Digital Economy. Washington, D.C.; 2018. P. 48.
5. Bukht R., Heeks R. Defining, Conceptualising and Measuring the Digital Economy. International Organisations Research Journal. 2018;13(2):143–172 (In Russ.) Available from: https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2018-02-07.
6. Digital Economy Report 2019: Value Creation and Capture: Implications for Developing Countries. New York: United Nations; 2019. 194 p. Available from: https://doiorg/10.18356/c7dc937a-en.
7. Abdrakhmanova G.I. et al. Indicators of the Digital Economy: 2022. Statistical Collection. Moscow: National Research University Higher School of Economics; 2023. 332 p. (In Russ.) Available from: https://doi.org/10.17323/978-5-7598-2697-2.
8. Nureev R.M., Karapaev O.V. Digital Economy as an Economic Institute. Journal of Economic Regulation. 2019;10(2):6–27. (In Russ.)
9. Golovenchik G. Theoretical Approaches to the Digital Economy Definition. The Science and Innovations. 2019;1(191): 54–59, 2019;2(192):40–45. (In Russ.)
10. Glinskiy V.V., Serga L.K. Problems of Statistical Accounting and Analysis of the Digital Economy. In: Data Science: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, 5-7 February 2020, St. Petersburg. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University of Economics; 2020. Pp. 88–91. (In Russ.)
11. Klochkova E.N., Prokhorov P.E. Definition of Digital Economy for the Purposes of Statistical Research. Voprosy Statistiki. 2020;27(4):66–79. (In Russ.) Available from: https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2020-27-4-66-79.
12. Yushina K.S. On One Approach to Measuring the Level of Digital Development Differentiation of Regional Economies. Territory Development. 2021;1(23):61–66. (In Russ.)
13. Yushina K.S. On Scientific Approaches to the Definition of the Digital Economy. Vestnik NSUEM. 2023;(2): 195–214. (In Russ.) Available from: https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2023-2-195-214.
14. Glinskiy V.V., Serga L.K. On Measurement of the Results of the Activities of Digital Economy at the Regional Level. Vestnik NSUEM. 2022;(4):219–233. (In Russ.) Available from: https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2022-4-219-233.
15. Kahn R.F. The Relation of Home Investment to Unemployment. The Economic Journal. 1931:41(162);98–173.
16. Keynes J.M. The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. London: Macmillan; 1936. (Russ. ed.: Keins Dzh.M. Obshchaya teoriya zanyatosti, protsenta i deneg. Moscow: Progress Publ.; 1978.)
17. Keynes J.M. The Means to Prosperity. London: Macmillan and Co.; 1933. P. 15.18. Samuelson P., Nordhaus V. Economics. Mc-Graw-Hill; 1948. (Russ. ed.: Samuel'son P., Nordkhaus V. Ekonomika. 18-e izdanie. Moscow: OOO «Vil'yams»; 2007. 1360 p.)
18. Samuelson P., Nordhaus V. Economics. McGraw-Hill; 1948. (Russ. ed.: Samuel'son P., Nordkhaus V. Ekonomika. 18-e izdanie. Moscow: OOO «Vil'yams»; 2007. 1360 p.)
19. Glinskiy V.V., Serga L.K., Shcherbak I.V. Estimation of Tourism Multiplier Effect at the Regional Level. Voprosy Statistiki. 2012;(1):48–52. (In Russ.)
20. Shkarupeta E.V., Ilyina E.A. Digital Circular Economy: Concept, Model, Strategies, Framework, Technologies. Production Organizer. 2022;30(4):9–17. (In Russ.) Available from: https://doi.org/10.36622/VSTU.2022.30.4.001.
21. Lisin V.S., Uzyakov M.N. Industry in the System of Inter-Industry Connections: Possibilities of Analysis and Forecasting. Moscow: Teis; 2002. 215 p. (In Russ.)
22. Perelet R.A. The Role of Information Technology in the Transition to a Closed-Cycle Economy. Educational Resources and Technologies. 2019;3(28):74–82. (In Russ.) Available from: https://doi.org/10.21777/2500-2112-2019-3-74-82.
23. Borisov V.N., Pochukaevа O.V. Green Growth of Industrial Regions of Russia Factors and Results. Vestnik NSUEM. 2020;(2):10–24. (In Russ.) Available from: https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2020-2-010-024.
24. Minakov V.F. Information Processes in the Formation of Hype Cycles. Territory Development. 2021;2(24):76– 82. (In Russ.)
25. Glinskiy V.V., Serga L.K. Approaches of Measuring Digital Economy in the Region. Economics of Russian East. 2021;1(13):10–18. (In Russ.) Available from: https://doi.org/10.25801/SRC.2021.44.47.002.
26. Savelyev Yu.V., Tolstoguzov O.V. (eds.) Managing Tourism Development in the Region. Experience in Implementing the Strategy of the Republic of Karelia. Petrozavodsk: KarRC RAS Publ.; 2008. 141 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Glinskiy V.V., Serga L.K., Yushina K.S. The Use of Multipliers in Assessing the Economic Effects of Digital Transformation of Territories (Case Study: Novosibirsk Region). Voprosy statistiki. 2024;31(2):52-60. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2024-31-2-52-60
Views:
375
Email this article 