Methodological Approaches to Assessing the Quality of Life of Older People in Russia

The paper presents the core findings of a study on improving methodological approaches to adequate assessment of dynamics of the quality of life of older people in Russia. The author has identified challenges in implementing some international recommendations on the topic thereon. These challenges resulted from differences in the socio-economic development of the Russian Federation and its ethnocultural traditions. The article defines domestic information and statistical base for studying the quality of life of the population, in particular, the older population.

The author describes a system of basic indicators that includes key measures of health status of older people, their financial security and economic activity. Based on the proposed approach and official statistics, the situation with the older generation in Russia in 2010–2020 is analyzed. An assessment is made of the significance of both positive trends in improving the quality of life in the older generation (increased life expectancy, improved health, increased economic activity of the population aged 60 years and older), as well as unresolved problems, primarily, relatively low level of pensions compared to the subsistence level and high degree of interregional differentiation of pensions.

The paper concludes with proposals concerning directions and sequence of organizational and financial measures aimed at improving the quality of life of pensioners, proposed by the author, based on specific results of statistical analysis. Among the top priorities are: indexation of pensions for non-working pensioners ahead of the inflation rate, indexation of pensions for working pensioners at 1/2 of the inflation rate, registration and, if necessary, organization of medical and social services for older citizens living alone.

1. Hank K. How «Successful» Do Older Europeans Age? Findings From SHARE. The Journals of Gerontology. Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 2011;66B(2):230–236. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbq089.

2. Helliwell J.F., Putnam R.D. The Social Context of Well–Being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Biological Sciences. 2004;359(1449):1435–1446. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1522.

3. Thompson N., Thompson S. Empowering Older People: Beyond the Care Model. Journal of Social Work. 2001;1(1): 61–76. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/146801730100100105.

4. Foster L. Active Ageing, Pensions and Retirement in the UK. Journal of Population Ageing. 2018;11(2):117–132. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12062-017-9181-7.

5. Rudawska I. Active Ageing and Its Impact on Labor Market. Economics & Sociology. 2001;3(1):9–24. Available from: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2010/3-1/2.

6. Léime Á.N. et al. (eds.) Gender, Ageing and Extended Working Life: Cross-National Perspectives. Bristol, UK: Policy Press;2017. 256 pp. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X19000126.

7. Ammann I., Heckenroth M. Innovations for Intergenerational Neigh-borhoods. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships. 2012;10(3):228–245. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2012.699837.

8. Jang H. et al. Formal Volunteering as a Protector of Health in the Context of Social Losses. Journal of Gerontological Social Work. 2018;61(8):834–848. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2018.1476945.

9. Fawcett S.B. et al. The Community Tool Box: A Web-Based Resource for Building Healthier Communities. Public Health Reports. 2000;115(2–3):274–278. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1308726/ (accessed 01.07.2023).

10. Zaidi A. et al. Active Ageing Index 2012. Concept, Methodology, and Final Results. European Centre Vienna; 2013. Available from: https://www.euro.centre.org/data/aai/1253897823_70974.pdf (accessed 28.07.2023).

11. Musick M.W., Regula Herzog A., House J.S. Volunteering and Mortality Among Old Adults: Findings from National Sample. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 1999;54B(3):S173–S180. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/54b.3.s173.

12. Pilkington P.D., Windsor T.D., Crisp D.A. Volunteering and Subjective Well-Being in Midlife and Older Adults: The Role of Supportive Social Networks. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 2012;67(2):249–260. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr154.

13. Varlamova M., Ermolina A., Sinyavskaya O. Active Ageing Index as an Evidence Base for Developing a Comprehensive Active Ageing Policy in Russia. Journal of Population Ageing. 2016;10(1):41–71. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12062-016-9164-0.

14. Kasimovskaya N.A. Egorova E.V. Evaluating Factors Potentially Affecting Physical Activity Indicator Among Older People. Social Aspects of Population Health. 2022;68(1):10. (In Russ.) Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/otsenka-kompleksa-faktorov-potentsialno-vliyayuschih-na-uroven-indikatora-fizicheskoy-aktivnosti-dlya-lits-starshego-pokoleniya (accessed 15.07.2023).

15. Vasilyeva E.V. Active Ageing Index of Russian regions: alternative approach. Population. 2022;25(3):128– 143. (In Russ.) Available from: https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2022.25.3.10.

16. Sidorenko A., Zaidi A. Active Ageing in CIS Countries: Semantics, Challenges, and Responses. Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research. 2013;(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/261819.

17. Pavlova I.A. et al. What Is Behind Composite Wellbeing Indices? Siberian Journal of Science. 2018;4(31):230– 254. (In Russ.) Available from: http://jwt.su/journal/article/view/851/858 (accessed 22.07.2023).

18. Olivera J.A. Cross-Country and Cohort Analysis of Active Ageing Differences Among the Elderly in Europe. In: Zaidi A. et al. (eds.) Building Evidence for Active Ageing Policies. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan; 2018. Р. 261–294. Available from: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-10-6017-5 (accessed 22.07.2023).

19. Frolova E.A., Malanina V.A. Active Ageing Index in Siberian Regions. Economy of Region. 2021;17(1):209– 222. (In Russ.) Available from: https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-1-16.

20. Pavlova I.A., Monastyrny E.A., Gumennikov I.V. Developing the Russian Index of Elderly Population Well-Being: Principles and Conceptual Framework. In: Casati F., Barysheva G.А., Krieger W. (eds.) Lifelong Wellbeing in the World – WELLSO 2016, European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Vol. 19. P. 514–522. Available from: https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.01.70.

21. Burtseva T.A., Chausov N.Yu., Gagarina S.N. Life Quality Assessment for the Aged Seniors in Russia. Russian Economic Online Journal. 2018;2. (In Russ.) Available from: http://www.e-rej.ru/Articles/2018/Burtseva.pdf (accessed 16.07.2023).

22. Aleshnikova V.I., Burtseva T.A., Nuriddinov Z.A. Social Effect of Implementing Active Longevity Strategies. UPRAVLENIE / MAN-AGEMENT (Russia). 2020;8(4):86– 93. (In Russ.) Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsialnyy-effekt-realizatsii-strategiy-aktivnogo-dolgoletiya (accessed 16.07.2023).

23. Pavlova I.A. et al. The Russian Elderly Well-Being Index (REWI): Methodology, Methods, Approbation. The Journal of Social Policy Studies. 2018;16(1):23–36. (In Russ.). Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/rossiyskiy-indeks-blagopoluchiya-starshego-pokoleniya-metodologiya-metodika-aprobatsiya (accessed 16.07.2023).