Building a Country Rating of Digitalization of the Economy Based on the Principal Component Analysis
https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2023-30-1-58-69
Abstract
The relevance of international comparisons of the level of digitalization of countries based on rating assessments is argued, due to the lack of uniformity in the methods and results of using information and communication technologies. The information base of the study is data from Rosstat and Eurostat on a number of digitalization variables for the period 2016–2020. The methodological basis of the analysis is the principal component method and k-means cluster analysis. The importance of using various statistical tools to assess the scale of digital inequality in the context of countries and regions is argued.
Scientific and methodological approaches to studying the problem of digital inequality were generalized. Three levels of digital gaps and statistical indicators reflecting them were allocated. The role of indices as generalizing indicators in assessing the level of digitalization of the economy and society was determined. A rating of European countries was built (in descending order of the calculated digitalization index). A grouping of countries that differ in the level of digital development is proposed, estimates of digital gaps are given.
The results of the statistical analysis showed that the leaders of the rating are Finland, Denmark, and Norway; outsiders are Greece, Bulgaria, Romania. All these countries occupy a stable position in the ranking. Three clusters of countries were formed in terms of the level (high, medium, low) of digitalization of the economy. It is shown that the digital gaps between European countries fluctuate in the range of 42–44%. Russia's place in the ranking of 20 countries in the period from 2016 to 2020 was determined.
About the Authors
A. O. Ovcharov
National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod (Lobachevsky University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anton O. Ovcharov – Dr. Sci. (Econ.). Professor, Department of Accounting, Principal Researcher, Macro and Microeconomics Research Center, Institute of Economics and Entrepreneurship
23, Gagarin Ave., Nizhny Novgorod, 603022
A. M. Terekhov
Russian State University of Justice (Volga Branch)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey M. Terekhov – Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Department of Humanities and Socio-Economic Disciplines
17А, Gagarin Ave., Nizhny Novgorod, 603022
References
1. Iansiti M., Lakhani K.R. Digital Ubiquity: How Connections, Sensors, and Data Are Revolutionizing Business. Harvard Business Review. 2014;92(11):90–99.
2. Pigni F., Piccoli G., Watson R. Digital Data Streams: Creating Value from Real-Time Flow of Big Data. California Management Review. 2016;58(3):5–25. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.3.5.
3. Greenstein S., Lerner J., Stern S. Digitization, Innovation, and Copyright: What Is the Agenda? Strategic Organization. 2013;11(1):110–121. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127012460940.
4. Hidalgo A. et al. The Digital Divide in Light of Sustainable Development: An Approach Through Advanced Machine Learning Techniques. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2020; 150:Article 119754. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119754.
5. Jamil S. From Digital Divide to Digital Inclusion: Challenges for Wide-Ranging Digitalization in Pakistan. Telecommunications Policy. 2021;45(8):Article 102206. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102206.
6. Brynjolfsson E., Collis A. How Should We Measure the Digital Economy? Harvard Business Review. 2019;97(6):140–146.
7. Ragnedda M., Muschert G. (eds) The Digital Divide: The Internet and Social Inequality in International Perspective (1 st ed.). London: Routledge, 2013; 324 p. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203069769.
8. Hoffman D.L., Novak T.P., Schlosser A. The Evolution of the Digital Divide: How Gaps in Internet Access May Impact Electronic Commerce. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2000;5(3). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00341.x.
9. Riggins F.J., Dewan S. The Digital Divide: Current and Future Research Directions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2005;6(12):298–337. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00074.
10. Chen W., Wellman B. The Global Digital Divide – Within and Between Countries. IT&Society. 2004;1(7): 39–45.
11. Gladkova A.A., Garifullin V.Z., Ragnedda M. Model of Three Levels of the Digital Divide: Current Advantages and Limitations (Exemplified by the Republic of Tatarstan). Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 10. Zhurnalistika. 2019;(4):41–72. (In Russ.) Available from: https://doi.org/10.30547/vestnik.journ.4.2019.4172.
12. Lucendo-Monedero A.L., Ruiz-Rodríguez F., González-Relaño R. Measuring the Digital Divide at Regional Level. A Spatial Analysis of the Inequalities in Digital Development of Households and Individuals in Europe. Telematics and Informatics. 2019;(41):197–217. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.05.002.
13. Cruz-Jesus F., Oliveira T., Bacao F. Digital Divide Across the European Union. Information & Management. 2012;49(6):278–291. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2012.09.003.
14. van Deursen A., van Dijk J. Internet Skills and the Digital Divide. New Media & Society. 2011;13(6):893–911. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810386774.
15. Selwyn N. Reconsidering Political and Popular Understandings of the Digital Divide. New Media & Society. 2004;6(3):341–362. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804042519.
16. van Dijk J.A. The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publ. Inc.; 2005. 224 р. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452229812.
17. Wei K.K. et al. Conceptualizing and Testing a Social Cognitive Model of the Digital Divide. Information Systems Research. 2011;22(1):170–187. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0273.
18. van Deursen A.J.A.M., Helsper, E.J. The Third-Level Digital Divide: Who Benefits Most from Being Online? In: Communication and Information Technologies Annual (Studies in Media and Communications, Vol. 10.). Bingley: Emerald Group Publ. Limited; 2015. P. 29–52. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002.
19. Ragnedda M. The Third Digital Divide: A Weberian Approach to Digital Inequalities. London: Routledge; 2017. 136 р. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315606002.
20. Ragnedda M., Kreitem H. The Three Levels of Digital Divide in East EU Countries. World of Media. Journal of Russian Media and Journalism Studies. 2018;(4):5–26. Available from: https://doi.org/10.30547/worldofmedia.4.2018.1.
21. Billon M., Ezcurra R., Lera-López F. Spatial Effects in Website Adoption by Firms in European Regions. Growth and Change. 2009;40(1):54–84. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2008.00461.x.
22. Szeles M.R. New Insights from a Multilevel Approach to the Regional Digital Divide in the European Union. Telecommunications Policy. 2018:42(6):452–463. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.03.007.
23. OECD, EU, EC-JRC. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. Paris: OECD Publ.; 2008. 158 р. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264043466-EN.
24. Perez-Castro M.A., Mohamed-Maslouhi M., Montero-Alonso M.Á. The Digital Divide and Its Impact on the Development of Mediterranean Countries. Technology in Society. 2021;64:Article 101452. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101452.
25. Corrocher N., Ordanini A. Measuring the Digital Divide: A Framework for the Analysis of Cross-Country Differences. Journal of Information Technology. 2002;17(1): 9–19. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/02683960210132061.
26. Arkhipova M.Yu., Sirotin V.P., Sukhareva N.A. Development of a Composite Indicator for Measuring the Value and Dynamics of Digital Inequality in Russia. Voprosy Statistiki. 2018;25(4):75–87. (In Russ.)
27. Lutz S.U. The European Digital Single Market Strategy: Local Indicators of Spatial Association 2011–2016. Telecommunications Policy. 2019;43(5):393–410. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.10.003.
28. Safiullin A.R., Moiseeva O.A. Digital Inequality: Russia and Other Countries in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Economics. 2019;12(6):26–37. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18721/JE.12602.
Review
For citations:
Ovcharov A.O., Terekhov A.M. Building a Country Rating of Digitalization of the Economy Based on the Principal Component Analysis. Voprosy statistiki. 2023;30(1):58-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2023-30-1-58-69
Views:
474
Email this article 