Methods of Multivariate Statistical Analysis in the Study of the Efficiency of Initiative Budgeting at the Regional Level

The paper presents a methodology of statistical analysis to assess efficiency of initiative budgeting at the regional level, which is one of the most urgent areas for improvement of the mechanism for managing socio-economic development of territories. The introductory part of the article explains the relevance of applying mathematical and statistical methods of analysis to improve the efficiency of initiative budgeting in the regions, and also describes theoretical and methodological provisions and information sources implemented in the author's own methodological studies designed to assess the efficiency of initiative budgeting on the example of the Stavropol Territory – pilot region for the implementation of the Local Initiatives Support Program (LISP).
While analyzing structural and dynamic relationships of indicators associated with financing and results of LISP implementation, the authors applied two versions of cluster analysis:
– clustering of municipal units of the studied region by the values of indicators of financing and LISP performance, ensuring the allocation of statistically homogeneous groups of administrative and territorial entities;
– clustering of indicators characterizing the volume of funding and LISP performance at the municipal level, which gave an idea of the multi-level interdependence of these indicators and was taken into account when building multi-factor models of the effectiveness of initiative budgeting programs in the region.
The article concludes that the indicators of infrastructure development using LISP funds are very important from the standpoint of socio-economic development of the territories, but are dependent on the living standards of the population, which provides the necessary degree of public initiative for «inclusion» of the LISP mechanism. In addition, the identified and assessed patterns, although they are common for the considered pilot region for the implementation of LISP, have specific manifestations in certain groups of municipalities, which requires finer targeted “tuning” of LISP by substantiating its projects to obtain socio-economic results, most relevant to each municipality.

1. Rimashevskaya N.M., Ivashinenko N.N. (eds.) Participatory Approach to Improving the Quality of Life of the Population: Monograph. Nizhny Novgorod, Moscow: Izd-vo Nizhegorodskogo gosuniversiteta; 2013. 268 p. (In Russ.)

2. Grinberg R.S., Rubinstein A.Ya. Problems of the General Theory of Social Economy. Economics of Contemporary Russia. 1998;2. (In Russ.) Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problemy-obschey-teorii-sotsialnoy-ekonomii/viewer.

3. Timokhina E.A. Evaluation of Citizens’ Participation in the Regional Budget Decision Making as a Tool of Economic Politics. Problems of Modern Economics. 2018;68(4):178–181. (In Russ.) Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/otsenka-stepeni-uchastiya-grazhdan-v-prinyatii-byudzhetnyh-resheniy-v-regione-kak-instrument-ekonomicheskoy-politiki/viewer.

4. Lokosov V.V. The Welfare State and the Participatory Society: A False Dilemma. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2015;(1):16–22. (In Russ.) Available from: https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2015-0-1-16-22.

5. Pechenskaya-Polishchuk M.A. Participatory Budgeting Development as Territory’s Budget Potential Growth Factor. Problems of Territory's Development. 2020;5(109):49– 66. (In Russ.) Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/razvitie-partisipatornogo-byudzhetirovaniya-kak-faktor-rosta-byudzhetnogo-potentsiala-territorii/viewer/.

6. Albert M. et al. In Defense of Participatory Economics. Science & Society. 2002;66(1):7–28. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40403950.

7. Galynis K.I., Tumunbayarova Zh.B. Trends and Prospects of Initiative Budgeting Development in Municipalities of the Transbaikal Region. Public Administration. E-journal (Russia). 2019;75:24–47. (In Russ.) Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_39282773_39385354.pdf.

8. Galynis K.I. Trends in the Development of the Initiative Budgeting in the Regions of the Far Eastern Federal District. Vestnik Universiteta. 2019;(8):12–19. (In Russ.) Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_39917708_86360146.pdf.

9. Galynis K.I., Miao H. Participatory Budgeting: Experience of the People. Public Administration. E-journal (Russia). 2020;78:112–135. (In Russ.) Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_42471921_21381509.pdf.

10. Vagin V.V. et al. Best Practices of Initiative Budgeting in the Russian Federation in 2017–2020. Moscow: Publishing House LLC Sam Polygraphist; 2021. 264 p. (In Russ.) Available from: https://www.nifi.ru/images/FILES/IB/2021/bestpractice20172020.pdf.

11. Vagin V.V., Gavrilova N.V. A Methodology for Evaluation of Programs and Practices of Initiative Budgeting in the Regions of the Russian Federation. Financial Analytics: Science and Experience. 2017;10(12):1393–1406. (In Russ.) Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_30754608_45603616.pdf/.

12. Khachatryan G. et al. Operational Guidance for the Practice of Initiative Budgeting: An Example of a Program to Support Local Initiatives. Moscow: Aleks Publ.; 2016. 88 p. (In Russ.)

13. Shul'ga I., Sukhova A. Local Initiatives Support Program: Local Self-Government Improvement and Initiative Budgeting Development. Мoscow: Aleks Publ.; 2016. 52 p. (In Russ.)

14. Dias N., Enríquez S., Júlio S. The Participatory Budgeting World Atlas. Portugal: Epopeia and Oficina; 2019. 51 p. Available from: https://www.cascais.pt/sites/default/files/anexos/gerais/new/participatory_budgeting_world_atlas_2019_1.pdf.