Статистика и управление: размышления о будущем официальной статистики в цифровом и глобализированном обществе
https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2021-28-4-23-44
Аннотация
Растущее значение статистических показателей, данных и информации для принятия политических решений отражено в простой и популярной формулировке – «данные для политики» (Data for Policy – D4P). Она охватывает такие хорошо известные основополагающие темы, как модернизация государственного сектора и формирование политики на основе фактических данных, ведущие к принятию решений с использованием новых технологий и бесконечно разнообразных источников данных. «Данные для политики» означают для официальной статистики больше, чем просто новые сведения, приемы и методы. Это также не в последнюю очередь вопрос сохранения важной функции и места официальной статистики в политике данных в будущем. Чтобы обосновать эту позицию, следует четко понимать задачи официальной статистики в (демократическом) обществе, а также то, как эти задачи следует по-новому интерпретировать в меняющихся условиях (прежде всего в связи с цифровизацией и глобализацией).
Об авторе
В. Дж. Радермахер
Римский Университет Ла Сапиенца
Италия
Италия
Радермахер Вальтер Джозеф – PhD, приглашенный научный сотрудник Департамента статистических наук
00185, г. Рим, Лацио, Италия, пл. Альдо Моро, 5
Список литературы
1. The Prime Minister and the Minister for the Cabinet Ofce. White Paper: Modernising Government. White Paper presented to Parliament. London: The Prime Minister and the Minister for the Cabinet Ofce by Command of Her Majesty; 1999.
2. Rose N. Governing by Numbers: Figuring out Democracy. Accounting, Organization and Society. 1991;16(7):673–692. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(91)90019-B.
3. Power M. The Audit Society. In: Hopwood A., Miller P. (eds) Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994:299–316.
4. van Veenstra A.F., Kotterink B. Data-Driven Policy Making: The Policy Lab Approach. In: Parycek P. et al. (eds) Electronic Participation. ePart 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 10429. Cham: Springer; 2017. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64322-9_9.
5. Verhulst S.G., Zeynep E., Crowcroft J. Data & Policy: A new Venue to Study and Explore Policy-Data Interaction. Data & Policy. 2019;1(e1):1–5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2019.2.
6. Turner F. Machine Politics: The Rise of the Internet and a New Age of Authoritarianism. Harper’s Magazine. 2019;(January):25–33. Available from: https://harpers.org/archive/2019/01/machine-politics-facebook-political-polarization/.
7. Desrosières A. The Politics of Large Numbers – A History of Statistical Reasoning. Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 1998.
8. Porter T.M. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, N. J.; Chichester:Princeton University Press; 1995.
9. Prévost J.-G. Politics and Policies of Statistical Independence. In: Prutsch M.J. (ed.). Science, Numbers and Politics. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; 2019:153–180.
10. van Doorn M. How Wrong Ideas about Knowledge Can Ruin Decisions. Medium – the Understanding Project. May 11, 2019. Available from: https://medium.com/the-understanding-project/how-wrong-ideas-about-knowledgeruin-decisions-ab6f1ed197ab.
11. Bartl W., Papilloud C., Terracher-Lipinsky A. Governing by Numbers – Key Indicators and the Politics of Expectations. Historical Social Research. 2019;44(2):7–43.
12. Soma K. et al. Introduction Article: Informational Governance and Environmental Sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2016;18:131–139.
13. Hendricks V.F., Vestergaard M. Postfaktisch: Die neue Wirklichkeit in Zeiten von Bullshit, Fake News und Verschwörungstheorien. München: Karl Blessing Verlag; 2018.
14. Box G.E.P. Science and Statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1976;71(356):791–799. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1976.10480949.
15. Wuppuluri S., Doria F.A. The Map and the Territory: Exploring the Foundations of Science, Thought and Reality. Springer International Publishing; 2018. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72478-2.
16. Mitroff I.I. Technology Run Amok – Crisis Management in the Digital Age. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; 2019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95741-8.
17. Vestberg H. Why we Need Both Science and Humanities for a Fourth Industrial Revolution Education. September 21, 2018. Available from: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/09/why-we-need-both-science-and-humanities-for-a-fourth-industrial-revolution-education/.
18. Radermacher W.J. Ofcial Statistics 4.0 – Verifed Facts for People in the 21st Century. Heidelberg: Springer Nature Switzerland AG; Imprint Springer; 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31492-7.
19. Patriarca S. Numbers and Nationhood. Writing Statistics in Nineteenth-Century Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
20. Habermas J. Der europäische Nationalstaat unter dem Druck der Globalisierung. Blätter für deutsche und international Politik. 1999;(4):425–36.
21. Cao L. Data Science: A Comprehensive Overview. ACM Computing Surveys. 2017;50(3):1–42. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1145/3076253.
22. Cao L. Data Science: Challenges and Directions. Communications of the ACM. 2017;60(8):59–68. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1145/3015456.
23. MacFeely S. Big Data and Ofcial Statistics. In: Kruger Strydom S., Strydom M. (eds) Big Data Governance and Perspectives in Knowledge Management. Hershey, PA: IGI Global; 2018:25–54. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7077-6.
24. Lehtonen M. Indicators: Tools for Informing, Monitoring or Controlling? In: Jordan A.J., Turnpenny J.R. (eds) The Tools of Policy Formulation – Actors, Capacities, Venues and Effects. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publ. 2015;76–99.
25. Davies W.The Limits of Neoliberalism – Authority, Sovereignty and the Logic of Competition. London: SAGE Publ.; 2016.
26. Peruzzi A. Complexity: Between Rhetoric and Science. In: Maggino F. (ed.) Complexity in Society: From Indicators Construction to Their Synthesis. Springer International Publ.; 2017:3–50.
27. Sangolt L. A Century of Quantifcation and «Cold Calculation». Trends in the Pursuit of Efciency, Growth and Pre-eminence. In: Sangolt L. (ed.) Between Enlightenment and Disaster: Dimensions of the Political Use of Knowledge. Brussels: P.I.E-Peter Lang S.A.; 2010:75–110.
28. Ryan L. 'If You Can't Measure It, You Can't Manage It': Not True. Forbes. February 10, 2014. Available from:https://www.forbes.com/sites/lizryan/2014/02/10/if-you-cantmeasure-it-you-cant-manage-it-is-bs/?sh=2a3017797b8b.
29. De Clerck J-P. i-SCOOP; 2017. Available from: https://www.i-scoop.eu/internet-of-things-guide/internet-of-things/.
30. Villani C. For a Meaningful Artifcial Intelligence: Towards a French and European Strategy. Mission Assigned by the Prime Minister Édouard Philippe. Paris: AI for Humanity – French Strategy for Artifcial Intelligence; 2018.
31. Diakopoulos N. Accountability in Algorithmic Decision Making. Communications of the ACM. 2016;59(2):56–62. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1145/2844110.
32. Benessia A. et al. The Rightful Place of Science: Science on the Verge. Tempe, AZ: Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes; 2016.
33. Beck U. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage Publ.; 1998.
34. Mance H. Britain Has Had Enough of Experts, Says Gove. Financial Times. June 3, 2016.
35. Fukuda-Parr S. Global Goals as a Policy Tool: Intended and Unintended Consequences. In: Fukuda-Parr S., Yamin A.E. (eds) The MDGs, Capabilities and Human Rights. New York: Routledge; 2015:14–27.
36. Lohr S. Civility in the Age of Artifcial Intelligence. ODBMS.org. November 6, 2016. Available from: http://www.odbms.org/2016/02/civility-in-the-age-of-artificial-intelligence/.
37. Haklay M. Citizen Science and Policy: A European Perspective. Case Study Series. Vol. 4. Washington, DC:Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars; 2015.Available from: https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/citizen-science-and-policy-european-perspective.
38. ECSA Policy Paper #3. Citizen Science as Part of EU Policy Delivery – EU Directives. 2016. Available from: https://ecsa.citizen-science.net/documents/.
39. Soma K. et al. Roles of Citizens in Environmental Governance in the Information Age – Four Theoretical Perspectives. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2016;(18):122–130. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.12.009.
40. Diaz-Bone R., Didier E. (eds) Conventions and Quantifcation – Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Statistics and Classifcations. Historical Social Research – Historische Sozialforschung. Special Issue. 2016;41(2).
41. Eyraud C. Stakeholder Involvement in the Statistical Value Chain: Bridging the Gap Between Citizens and Ofcial Statistics. In: Eurostat. Power from Statistics: Data, Information and Knowledge. Outlook Report – 2018 ed. Luxembourg: Publication Ofce of the European Union; 2018.
42. Davies W. How Statistics Lost Their Power – And Why We Should Fear What Comes Next. The Guardian. January19, 2017. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jan/19/crisis-of-statistics-big-data-democracy.
43. Arnade C. Why Trump Voters are not «Complete Idiots». May 31, 2016. Available from: https://medium.com/@Chris_arnade/trump-politics-and-option-pricing-or-whytrump-voters-are-not-idiots-1e364a4ed940#.faldoe9vg.
44. König A., Ravetz J. (eds) Sustainability Science: Key Issues. New York: Routledge; 2018.
45. WeObserve. An Ecosystem of Citizen Observatories for Environmental Monitoring. WeObserve; 2018. Available from: https://www.weobserve.eu/.
46. Joost G., Unteidig A. Design and Social Change: The Changing Environment of a Discipline in Flux. In: Jonas W., Zerwas S., von Anshelm K. (eds) Transformation Design Perspectives on a New Design Attitude. Basel: Birkhäuser; 2015.
47. Gericke K., Eisenbart B., Waltersdorfer G. Staging Design Thinking for Sustainability in Practice: Guidance and Watch-Outs. In: König A., Ravetz J. (eds) Sustainability Science. New York: Routledge; 2018:147–156.
48. Hisschemöller M., Cuppen E. Participatory Assessment: Tools for Empowering, Learning and Legitimating? In: Jordan A.J., Turnpenny J.R. (eds) The Tools of Policy Formulation – Actors, Capacities, Venues and Effects. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publ. 2015;33–51.
49. Lehtonen M., Sébastien L., Bauler T. The Multiple Roles of Sustainability Indicators in Informational Governance: Between Intended Use and Unanticipated Influence. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2016;(18):1–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.05.009.
50. Stapleford T.A. Price Indexes, Political Judgments, and the Challenge of Democratic Control. Ottawa Group – International Working Group on Price Indices – Fourteenth Meeting; May 20th to 22nd 2015; Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo: Statistics Japan; 2015.
51. HLEG. A Multi-Dimensional Approach to Disinformation. Report of the Independent High Level Group on Fake News and Online Disinformation. Luxembourg: European Commission, Directorate-General for Communication Networks CaT; 2018. Available from: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/fnal-report-high-level-expertgroup-fake-news-and-online-disinformation.
52. Wigglesworth R. Can Big Data Revolutionise Policymaking by Governments? Financial Times. January 31, 2018.
53. Heubl B. Night Light Images Paint Accurate Picture of China GDP. Nikkei Asian Review. March 24, 2018. Available from: https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Datawatch/Night-light-images-paint-accurate-picture-of-China-GDP.
54. Seltzer W. Politics and Statistics: Independence, Dependence or Interaction? DESIPA Working Paper No. 6. New York: UN; 1994. Available from: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/statcom/FP-Seltzer.pdf.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Радермахер В.Д. Статистика и управление: размышления о будущем официальной статистики в цифровом и глобализированном обществе. Вопросы статистики. 2021;28(4):23-44. https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2021-28-4-23-44
For citation:
Radermacher W.J. Governing-by-the-Numbers / Statistical Governance: Reflections on the Future of Ofcial Statistics in a Digital and Globalised Society. Voprosy statistiki. 2021;28(4):23-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2021-28-4-23-44
Просмотров:
720
Послать статью по эл. почте 