Preview

Voprosy statistiki

Advanced search

Trends in Dissolution of First Partnerships in Russia

https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2021-28-2-54-66

Abstract

The article scrutinizes one of the most acute problems in Russian society – the continued high level of separations among first unions.
According to the official statistics data, Russia has consistently held a leading position in terms of divorce rates among European countries.
Recent estimates of period total divorce rates suggest that 30–40% of marriages contracted in the 1970-1980s and 50–60% of marriages contracted in the last two decades have a chance of being dissolved.
The authors use materials from the panel part of the sample survey «Parents and children, men and women in the family and society» to examine the stability of first unions formed in 1945–2010 – either direct marriage, marriage after cohabitation or cohabitation in partnership cohorts. The results suggest an increase in the proportion of dissolved marriages from 14% in the marital cohorts of 1945–1954 to 30% in marital cohorts of 1980–1989. In these cohorts, «direct» marriages were more stable than marriages, which followed cohabitations. However, it is not so obvious for marriages preceded by cohabitations in the 1990s.
Authors conclude that the average duration of a dissolved marriage and the average age of women at the time of the dissolution of the marriage have decreased. Cohabitation remains the least stable form of union with an average duration of 4–5 years. Childless unions break up 2 times more often both among marriages and cohabitations. There has been also a decrease in the average number of children in all types of broken unions with children.
Based on results formulated at the final part of the article the authors suggest that the «direct» marriage without prior cohabitation become a less attractive form of union that might positively affect the stability of Russian marriages by reducing the probability of divorce due to such grounds of divorce as incompatibility in characters, views and beliefs, especially in the initial years of joint life.

About the Authors

E. V. Churilova
National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE University)
Russian Federation

Elena V. Churilova – Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Research Fellow,  International Laboratory for Population and Health

3, Bol’shoj Trehsvjatitel’skij Pereulok, Moscow, 109028



S. V. Zakharov
National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE University)
Russian Federation

Sergei V. Zakharov – Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Deputy Director, Institute of  Demography

3, Bol’shoj Trehsvjatitel’skij Pereulok, Moscow, 109028



References

1. Council of Europe. Recent Demographic Developments in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing; 2006.

2. Sobotka T., Toulemon L. Overview Chapter 4: Changing Family and Partnership Behavior: Common Trends and Persistent Diversity Across Europe. Demographic Research. 2008;(19):85-138.

3. Goldstein J.R. The Leveling of Divorce in the United States. Demography. 1999;36(3):409-414.

4. Hargens L.L. Incidence of First-Marriage Divorce Among Women in the 1979 Panel of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. Demographic Research. 2019;(40):1529-1536.

5. Zakharov S.V. (ed.) Russia’s Population in 2015. 23rd Annual Demographic Report. Moscow: HSE Publishing House, 2017. 360 p. (In Russ.)

6. Bondarskaya G.A. Analysis of Divorces in Women Cohorts. In: Socio-Demographic Analysis of Marriage, Family, Fertility, and Reproductive Orientations. Yerevan; 1983. P. 31–35. (In Russ.)

7. Volkov A.G. Family – Object of Demography. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ.; 1986. 271 p. (In Russ.)

8. Kuznetcov L.R. Divorces: Trends, Factors, Tendencies. In: Volkov A.G. (ed.) Methodology of Demographic Projection. Moscow: Nauka publ., 1988. Pp. 88–99. (In Russ.)

9. Toltz M. Some General Indicators of Nuptiality, Diversity and Marriage Duration. In: Volkov A.G. (ed.) Demographic Development of Family. Moscow: Statistika Publ.; 1979. Pp. 39–58. (In Russ.)

10. Chuiko L.V. Marriages and Divorces. Moscow: Statistika Publ.; 1976. 175 p. (In Russ.)

11. Sysenko V.A. Marital Stability: Problems, Factors, Conditions. Moscow: Finansy i Statistika Publ.; 1981. 199 p. (In Russ.)

12. Avdeev A., Monnier A. Marriage in Russia. A Complex Phenomenon Poorly Understood. Population. An English selection. 2000;(12):7–50.

13. Toltz M. Divorces and Modern Level of Fertility. In: Problems of Reproduction and Employment. Moscow: ISI AN SSSR; 1984. Pp.18–30. (In Russ.)

14. Antonov G., Laktukhina E. The Crisis of Marriage Institutions in Modern Russia: Reality or Fiction? Voprosy Statistiki. 2015;(7):21–31. (In Russ.)

15. Gałęzewska P. Repartnering Dynamics and Fertility in New Partnerships in Europe and the United States. Doctoral thesis. University of Southampton, School of Social Sciences; 2016. 272 p.

16. Gałęzewska P., Perelli-Harris B., Berrington A. Cross-National Differences in Women’s Repartnering Behaviour in Europe: The Role of Individual Demographic Characteristics. Demographic Research. 2017; (37): 189–228.

17. Philipov D., Jasilioniene A. Union Formation and Fertility in Bulgaria and Russia: A Life Table Description of Recent Trends. Demographic Research. 2008;(19):2057–2114.

18. Andersson G., Thomson E., Duntava A. Life-Table Representations of Family Dynamics in the 21st Century. Demographic Research. 2017;(37):1081–1230.

19. Zakharov S.V., Maleva T.M., Sinyavskaya O.V. Program «Generation and Gender»: Methodological Questions. In: Maleva T.M., Sinyavskaya O.V. (eds). Pa-rents and Children, Men and Women in Family and Society. Moscow: Independent Institute for Social Policy; 2007. (In Russ.)

20. Coviello V., Boggess M. Cumulative Incidence Estimation in the Presence of Competing Risks. The Stata Journal. 2004;4(2):103–112.

21. Kreyenfeld M. R., Bastin S. Blurred Memory, Deliberate Misreporting, or «True Tales»? How Different Survey Methods Affect Respondents’ Reports of Partnership Status at First Birth. Working Paper WP-2013-017. Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research; 2013.

22. Wagner M. On Increasing Divorce Risks. In: Mortelmans D. (ed.) Divorce in Europe. New Insights in Trends, Causes and Consequences of Relation Break-ups. Springer Open; 2020. P. 37–61.

23. Tol’ts M.S., Antonova O.I., Andreev E.M. Birth Rate and the Family Institution Transformation in the Modern Russia. Voprosy Statistiki. 2005;(7):51–60. (In Russ.)

24. Biryukova S.S., Tyndik A.O. Getting Married and Having a Child in Russia: An Analysis of Individual Biographies Basing on Vital Statistics Data. Demographic Review. 2014;1(3):33–64. (In Russ.)

25. Churilova E.V., Chumarina V.Zh. Nonmarital Fertility and Premarital Conceptions in Russia: Parents’ Deliberate Decision? Voprosy Statistiki. 2014;(7):43–49. (In Russ.)

26. Jasilioniene A. Premarital Conception and Divorce Risk in Russia in Light of the GGS Data MPIDR. Working Paper WP-2007-025. Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research; 2007.

27. Mitrofanova E.S. Marriages, Partnerships and Fertility of Russian Generations. Demoscope-Weekly. 2011;(477–478). (In Russ).

28. Chernova Zh.V. Speficity of Gender Relationship Among Young Adults. Sociological Studies. 2012;(7):118–127. (In Russ.)

29. Artamonova A.V., Mitrofanova E.S. Cohabitation in Russia: «Tria» Union or an Independent Social Institution. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2016;(1):126–146. (In Russ.)

30. Beaujouan É. Second-Union Fertility in France: Partners’ Age and Other Factors. Population (English Edition). 2011;66(2):239–274.

31. Zakharov S.V., Churilova E.V., Agadjanian V.S. Fertility in Higher-Order Marital Unions in Russia: Does a New Partnership Allow for the Realization of the Two-Child Ideal? Demographic Review. 2016;3(1):35–51. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Churilova E.V., Zakharov S.V. Trends in Dissolution of First Partnerships in Russia. Voprosy statistiki. 2021;28(2):54-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2021-28-2-54-66

Views: 998


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2313-6383 (Print)
ISSN 2658-5499 (Online)