Preview

Voprosy statistiki

Advanced search

Quality and Factors of Economic Development: Matters of Evaluation and Analysis

https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2020-27-3-26-44

Abstract

In this publication, the authors establish validity of the proposals on the methodology for analyzing the quality and factors of the economic development of the Russian Federation, not for the country in general (as it was done in the first part of the article, published in Voprosy Statistiki, No. 2 for 2020), but at the regional level. The main focus is to study the factors determining the quality of human capital as well as their specifics for several Russian regions. All the proposed methodological techniques of analysis are implemented on the example of the education sector that is fundamental for improving the quality of human capital during the emergence of a new technological paradigm, with account to raising and nurturing the creative generation of young people who will shape the new order. It is noted that amidst the development of modern technologies responsible for the transfer of data and knowledge, as well as standardization and regulation of the processes of providing services, it is necessary to maintain the content of education services, their focus on the shaping of a creative personality and transferring creative work skills. Only this shall ensure the country’s participation and its benefits in the creation of a new technological structure.

The article examines factors that touch upon differentiation of regions by the level and quality of education, such as the state of the material and technical base, personnel availability and qualifications, terms for the provision of services, and others. The authors delve into the influence of region resource provision factors, remoteness from labour force centers of gravity, and emerging research centers, as well as national particularities and historical background of the regions. The data on the «personnel migration» of young people of educational and post-educational age are presented. Relevant conclusions are made about some depletion of this resource in several remote regions due to the attractive policies of strong regions.

The authors argue that the regional efforts and the redistribution of funds through the federal budget, as well as business efforts, are not enough to reduce the regional differentiation in education quality. This requires tailored solutions allowing to use the potential of young people from remote regions and regions not affected by scientific centralization, as an important human development factor. The paper considers directions for solving this problem.

 

About the Authors

G. O. Kuranov
Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Gennadii O. Kuranov – Cand. Sci. (Econ.); Leading Expert

10, Presnenskaya Emb., Bldg. 2, Moscow, 125039

 



R. F. Luk’yanenko
Vnesheconombank Institute
Russian Federation

Raisa F. Luk’yanenkoHead of Direction, Human Resources

9, Akademika Sakharova Prospekt, Moscow, 107996



References

1. UN. Sustainable Development Goals. (In Russ.) Available from: http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/ru/sustainable-development-goals/.

2. The Inclusive Growth and Development Report 2018. Available from: http://reports.weforum.org/inclusive-growth-and-development-report-2018/.

3. Anand R., Mishra M., Peiris S. Inclusive Growth: Measurement and Determinants? IMF Working Paper. 2013.

4. Murtin F., Schreyer P. Inclusive Growth: OECD Measurement Framework. OECD Statistics Working Papers. 2015.

5. Kuranov G.O. Measuring the Quality of Economic Growth. Voprosy Statistiki. 2019;26(7):5-19. (In Russ.)

6. System of Indicators for Assessing the Quality of Economic Growth. Scientific Report of the RFTA. Moscow: 2019. (In Russ.)

7. Klepach A., Kuranov G. Cyclical Waves in the Economic Development of the U.S. and Russia (Issues of Methodology and Analysis). Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2013;(11):4-33. (In Russ.)

8. Kuranov G.O. On Research of Economic Dynamics for Forecasting Purposes. Voprosy Statistiki. 2014;(6):8-19. (In Russ.)

9. Barinova V.A., Zemtsov S.P. Inclusive Growth and Regional Resilience in Russia. Region: Economics and Sociology. 2019;1(101):23-46. (In Russ.)

10. Sevastianova A. Ie., Tokarev A. N., Shmat V. V. Application Features of Inclusive Development Concept in Resource Regions. 2017;1(93):213-236. (In Russ.)

11. Solow R.M. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1956;70(1):65-94.

12. Koopmans T.C. On the Concept of Optimal Economic Growth. In: Johansen J. (ed.) The Econometric Approach to Development Planning. Amsterdam, North Holland: 1965.

13. Lucas R.E. On the Mechanics of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary Economics. 1988;22(1):3-42.

14. Rebelo S. Long-Run Policy Analysis and Long-Run Growth. Journal of Political Economy. 1991;99(3):500-521.

15. Caballe J., Santos M.S. On Endogenous Growth with Physical and Human Capital. Journal of Political Economy. 1993;101(6):1042-1067.

16. Barro R.J., Sala-i-Martin X. Economic Growth. New York: McGraw Hill; 1995.

17. Barro R.J. Determinants of Economic Growth: A CrossCountry Empirical Study. №. w5698 (August). Cambridge National Bureau of Economic Research; 1996.

18. Barro R.J., Sala-i-Martin X. Technological Diff usion, Convergence, and Growth. National Bureau of Economic Research. 1995, Working Paper No. 5151.

19. Uzawa H. Optimal Technical Change in an Aggregative Model of Economic Growth. International Economic Review. 1965;6(1);18-31.

20. Lucas R.E. On the Mechanics of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary Economics. 1988;22(1):3-42.

21. Romer P.M. Endogenous Technological Change. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper No. 3210. 1989.

22. Nelson R.R., Phelps E.S. Investment in Humans, Technological Diff usion, and Economic Growth. American Economic Review. 1966;56(1/2):69-75.

23. Benhabib J., Spiegel M.M. The Role of Human Capital in Economic Development: Evidence from Aggregate Cross-Country Data. Journal of Monetary Economics. 1994;34(2):143-173.

24. Kuranov G.O., Luk’yanenko R.F. Study of Economic Dynamics and Validation of Growth Factors. Voprosy Statistiki. 2017;1(11):3-20. (In Russ.)

25. Kuranov G.O. Applying Factor and Interindustry Models to Economic Analysis and Forecasting. Voprosy Statistiki. 2018;25(10):7-20. (In Russ.)

26. Analytical Materials Based on the Results of the National Study on the Quality of Mathematical Education in Grades 5-7. Part 1. Federal Service for Supervision in Education and Science. 2014-2015. Available from: https://fioco.ru/Media/Default/Documents/NIKO/57_NIKO_MA_part_1.pdf.


Review

For citations:


Kuranov G.O., Luk’yanenko R.F. Quality and Factors of Economic Development: Matters of Evaluation and Analysis. Voprosy statistiki. 2020;27(3):26-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2020-27-3-26-44

Views: 770


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2313-6383 (Print)
ISSN 2658-5499 (Online)