Demographic Policy in Russia: Performance Evaluation

   One of the reasons for the heavy hindering of the socio-economic development of modern Russia – is a new protracted wave of depopulation. In this regard, it is relevant and practically significant to analyze basic problems in the strategic management of demographic development and impartially assess the effectiveness of the tasks solved in this area, primarily in the field of birth rate growth. The article focuses on reviewing the core regulatory document in the field of demography – the Concept of the Demographic Policy of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2025. A number of its imperfections admitted at the development stage are identified, and directions for improving the document are proposed. The article assesses the dynamics of several core target demographic indicators and attempts to identify problems and factors affecting the birth rate in the country. The correlations assessment confirmed the importance of social support measures and regional maternity capital for achieving the increase in the birth rate, which is essential for overcoming depopulation processes in society. A serious barrier to demographic development has been identified, caused by the widespread practice of postponing childbearing, which has demonstrated stability in the younger generation, regardless of the self-assessment of their standard of living. Against this background, the transformation of the fertility age model was determined – the modal age of mothers for fifteen years has shifted by more than five years. There is a positive confirmation of the connection between the intention of young people to marry and their desire to have a child, which seems essential for family well-being and forms the prerequisites for further demographic development, based on the calculated Pearson and Chuprov's mutual contingency coefficients.

1. Rimashevskaya N. M. Russian Cross. Priroda. 1999; (6): 3–10. (In Russ.)

2. Makhutov N. A. Security of Russia. Legal, Socio-Economic and Scientific and Technical Aspects. Thematic block "National security". Research and development of national security problems. Moscow: MGOF "Knowledge"; 2022. 524 p. (In Russ.)

3. The Future of Analytics: From Elementary Truths to the System of Think Tanks. Monograph. Moscow: Nauchnyi ekspert Publ.; 2013. 115 p. (In Russ.) Available from: http://csef.ru/ru/nauka-i-obshchestvo/499/budushhee-analitiki-ot-azbuchnyh-istin-k-sisteme-analiticheskih-czentrov-4890 (Accessed 04. 11. 2022).

4. Rostovskaya T. K., Zolotareva O. A. Demographic Stability as a Priority of the RF Demographic Policy. Management Issues. 2022; (3): 6–18. (In Russ.) Available from: 10.22394/2304-3369-2022-3-6-18.

5. Rybakovsky L. L., Khasayev G. R. Strategy of the Demographic Development of Russia, the Notion and Contents. Population. 2015; 2 (68): 51–62. (In Russ.)

6. Antonov I. P. Peculiarities and Correlation of Categories «Conception» and «Doctrine» in the Science of International Law. Eurasian Law Journal. 2009; 3 (10). (In Russ.) Available from: https://eurasialaw.ru/2009g/3-10-2009g (Аccessed 07. 11. 2022).

7. Rybakovskiy L. L. Demographic Policy Concept in Russia: Experiences in Development and Ways of Improving. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2015; (9): 62–70. (In Russ.)

8. Zemlyanova E. V., Chumarina V. Zh. Births’ Postponement by Women in Russia Within Modern Socio-Economic Context. Social Aspects of Population Health. 2018; 64 (6). (In Russ.) Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.21045/2071-5021-2018-64-6-9.

9. Leridon H. Can Assisted Reproduction Technology Compensate for the Natural Decline in Fertility with Age? A Model Assessment. Human Reproduction. 2004; 19 (7): 1548–1553. Available from: doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh304.

10. Syrkasheva A. G., Ilina E. O., Dolgushina N. V. Infertility in Women of Advanced Age: Etiology, Management, Application of Preimplantation Genetic Screening. Gynecology. 2016; 18 (3): 40–43. (In Russ.) Available from: https://gynecology.orscience.ru/2079-5831/article/view/28542 (Accessed 06. 11. 2022).

11. Bergnéhr D. Social Influence and the Timing of Parenthood. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relations. 2009;3:61–83. Available from: doi: 10.5964/ijpr.v3isupp1.69.

12. Frejka T. Parity Distribution and Completed Family Size in Europe: Incipient Decline of the Two-Child Family Model? Demographic Research. 2008; 19 (4): 47–71. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298951099_Parity_distribution_and_completed_family_size_in_Europe_Incipient_decline_of_the_two-child_family_model (Accessed 10. 11. 2022).

13. Sobotka T. Postponement of Childbearing and Low Fertility in Europe. Population. 2004; 59 (5): 819. Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Postponement-of-Childbearing-and-Low-Fertility-in-Sobotka/079a0f946e16381fb6bab9c85756ad3b26f3af72 (Accessed 10. 11. 2022).

14. Waldenström U. Postponing Parenthood to Advanced Age. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences. 2016; 121 (4): 235–243. Available from: doi: 10.1080/03009734.2016.1201553.

15. Rostovskaya T. K., Zolotareva O. A., Vasil'eva E. N. Models of Matrimonial and Reproductive Behavior of Russian Youth. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2022; 15 (3): 184–199. (In Russ.) Available from: doi: 10.15838/esc.2022.3.81.10.

16. Rostovskaya Т. K., Kuchmaeva О. V., Zolotareva О. А. On Building Regions’ Rating by Target Indicators of the Effectiveness of Family and Demographic Policy. Problems of Territory's Development. 2022; 26 (4): 80–97. (In Russ.) Available from: doi: 10.15838/ptd.2022.4.120.6.

17. Ageev A. I. Demography in the System of Scenarios and Coordinates. Economic Strategies. 2020; (8): 44–55. (In Russ.) Available from: doi: 10.33917/es-8.174.2020.44–55.

18. Trynov A. V., Kostina S. N., Bannykh G. A. Examination of Socio-economic Determinants of Fertility Based on the Regional Panel Data Analysis. Economy of Region. 2020; 16 (3):807–819. (In Russ.) Available from: doi: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2020–3-10.

19. Maleva T. M., Sinyavskaya O. V. Socio-Economic Factors of Fertility in Russia: Empirical Measurements and Challenges to Social Policy. SPERO. 2006; (5): 70–97. (In Russ.) Available from: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2007/0309/analit02.php.

20. Bokov A. N. et al. (eds.) Demographic Threats to the Russian Federation in Terms of Globalization. Moscow: Ru-Science Publ.; 2015. 154 p. (In Russ.)

21. Soboleva S. V., Smirnova N. E., Chudaeva O. V. Demographic Security of Russia: Regional Measures, Results Estimation. The World of New Economy. 2016; (4): 142–153. (In Russ.)

22. Ryazantsev S. V., Miryazov T. R. Demographic Well-Being: Theoretical Approaches to the Definition and Assessment Methodology. DEMIS. Demographic Research. 2021; 1 (4): 5–19. (In Russ.) Available from: doi: 10.19181/demis.2021.1.4.1.